Part numbers & component introduction

Anything about Ariels
Post Reply
Paul Gasson
Holder of a Nylon Anorak
Holder of a Nylon Anorak
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2015 4:58 pm
Location: Lancashire UK
Contact:

Part numbers & component introduction

Post by Paul Gasson »

Out of general interest can anyone offer any suggestions regarding factory changes to components and updates to the part number.

For example if an original first use part had suffix -54 when it was originally introduced, would that always be from the beginning of the manufacturing year on 1st September 1953? Alternatively, was it was from when the factory used up all the previously used assemblies. I can’t imagine there would be a hard cutoff from one year to the next but maybe there was.

When a modified or revised part was introduced, is it likely to have been across the whole range of bikes or was there a trickle down with the range toppers getting the change one year and lesser models a year or so later.

Just curious to find out how these changes were accomplished.
1935 RH, 1950 NH
User avatar
simon.holyfield
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Posts: 5243
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 11:16 pm
Location: Norfolk
Contact:

Re: Part numbers & component introduction

Post by simon.holyfield »

Interesting questions! I suspect Roger, as keeper of the works drawings, may be able to help.
cheers

Simes
Machine Registrar (registrar@arielownersmcc.com)

'51 Square Four,
'58 Huntmaster,
'42 W/NG,
'30 Model A
https://ariel-square-four.blogspot.com
User avatar
Roger Gwynn
Holder of a Golden Anorak
Holder of a Golden Anorak
Posts: 2098
Joined: Tue May 28, 2013 11:34 am
Location: Norwich, UK
Contact:

Re: Part numbers & component introduction

Post by Roger Gwynn »

Depends! Usually a new part was fitted to the relevant models from the start of the new year. There are a few occasions when a part was changed during the year and they will usually not appear in the parts book until the following year and may have the suffix of the year they were listed, rather than introduced.

Parts sometimes changed without being given a new number, usually only if they were interchangeable but not always and today this matters to us but not then. For example there are 3 versions of the MKII exhaust manifold but they all fit all years and to the untrained eye they all appear to be the same.

Generally the new part would be fitted to all applicable models straight away, one exception is the change from girder forks to teles where there is clear evidence that the SQ4s had them before the 'lesser' models. There are also instances of last year's parts being used up on the current year and vice versa but this was nowhere near as widespread as people seem to think. I often hear that 'they built the bikes out whatever they had lying around', which is clearly ridiculous when the factory was building thousands of bikes a year. It does apply to the Meriden factory during the strike.
Roger Gwynn, caretaker of the club's works drawings and machine register, membership secretary 2015-26. Director of AOMCC, Draganfly Motorcycles, Craven Equipment and Supreme Motorcycles mostly retired.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 6 guests