I'd be wary of restricting the flow using small holes after spending a ridiculous amount of my working career in subsea hydraulics. There's a formula used in fluid dynamics called the Darcy–Weisbach equation which basically says that pressure loss in pipes is proportional to the diameter of the pipe and the length of the pipe - go into your garden, turn on the outside tap and observe the time it takes to fill a bucket. Then attach 100 metres of hose and see how long it takes to fill the same bucket - it will be much longer, which is down to friction losses in the hose.camstevens wrote:Guy
I'm also curious as to what a Joggle Wire is. I was thinking of fitting a needle valve in the rocker feed line, but as Simon alludes to.....starving the cam lobes would be a worse outcome. Perhaps a restrictor stud with reduced orifices is a safer starting point.
Cam
Now we are trying to reduce the oil flow rate to the rockers, which we do by introducing a pressure drop. We can do this with an orifice, by reducing the size of the hole in a banjo or introducing a short pellet with a tiny hole in it which will be effective as long as the oil is clean enough not to block the hole. Alternatively, we can use a relatively long pipe with a smaller diameter, which will be a more reliable option since we don't have to worry about oil cleanliness.
Hence my choice - use the small pipe as Ariel did to feed the rockers and the large one to feed the gauge. My bike doesn't smoke, by the way.