The letter in this months Cheval raised the issue of rogue traders and cautioned against listing these on club sites.
I have experienced a few disreputable traders / suppliers over the past few years.
I believe the way around this could be to list on the members only site those that members would recomend and those they wouldn't.
Without giving any reasons it would be just opinions , and therefore, not defamatory or libellous.
I for one would welcome such a list .
Thoughts please.
Rogue traders
-
Simon.Gardiner
- Holder of a Golden Anorak
- Posts: 1670
- Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:37 pm
- Location: South West (Bristol-ish)
- Contact:
Re: Rogue traders
Mike
I know where you're coming from but aren't opinions as defamatory and/or libellous as anything else?
And without a 'reason' isn't it just one person berating another?
Also...surely we already have a place where experiences can be carefully (and diplomatically) recorded - in 'Suppliers'
SG
I know where you're coming from but aren't opinions as defamatory and/or libellous as anything else?
And without a 'reason' isn't it just one person berating another?
Also...surely we already have a place where experiences can be carefully (and diplomatically) recorded - in 'Suppliers'
SG
Web admin (webmaster@arielownersmcc.com)
'55 Huntmaster, '56 VH, ' 51 VH, '62 Arrow, '80 R100RT, '00 Sprint ST (now with a new Arrow project, and just now those 4-stroke Ariel parts can't even make one running bike...)
'55 Huntmaster, '56 VH, ' 51 VH, '62 Arrow, '80 R100RT, '00 Sprint ST (now with a new Arrow project, and just now those 4-stroke Ariel parts can't even make one running bike...)
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 12 guests