SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

User avatar
dave.owen
Holder of a Golden Anorak
Holder of a Golden Anorak
Posts: 1805
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: swindon
Contact:

Re: SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

Post by dave.owen »

With tassels please
AOMCC Treasurer
User avatar
Steven.Carter
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Posts: 4311
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 4:45 am
Location: Eastleigh, Hampshire
Contact:

Re: SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

Post by Steven.Carter »

dave.owen wrote:With tassels please
I'm on it :lol:
User avatar
Vincent.vanGinneke
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Posts: 4311
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:14 am
Location: "The Dutch Branch"
Contact:

Re: SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

Post by Vincent.vanGinneke »

The F cam on the right is for a WNG and has 5-55-60-20 as timing.
The twin lobe cam in the middle has 22-70-70-25
The single lobe 'A' cam has 26-77-70-33
What cam should I choose to give a WNG a bit more poke ?
Go for the 'A 'cam ? (with longer pushrods)
3 camshafts.JPG
User avatar
dave.owen
Holder of a Golden Anorak
Holder of a Golden Anorak
Posts: 1805
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 10:05 pm
Location: swindon
Contact:

Re: SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

Post by dave.owen »

Single lobe and a bigger carb,1 inch


Dave
AOMCC Treasurer
User avatar
Vincent.vanGinneke
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Posts: 4311
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:14 am
Location: "The Dutch Branch"
Contact:

Re: SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

Post by Vincent.vanGinneke »

Next one.

WNG crankshaft weighs 1 kilo less then a '54 NH crankshaft.
For speedier (....) pick up a WNG crank would be fine, but would a heavier crank be better in the long run (whatever that is)
weight WNG.JPG
weight NH.JPG
User avatar
Vincent.vanGinneke
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Posts: 4311
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:14 am
Location: "The Dutch Branch"
Contact:

Re: SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

Post by Vincent.vanGinneke »

the importance of maintenance......

filled to the brim
muck.JPG
on the way out
bigend.JPG
User avatar
Vincent.vanGinneke
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Posts: 4311
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:14 am
Location: "The Dutch Branch"
Contact:

Re: SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

Post by Vincent.vanGinneke »

Today I bought two crankcases , one from a RAF WNG with RBH code and one from a 1949 NH .
The NH crankcase bears the code DJ2050X
What would that 'X' mean ? I have not seen the numbers ending with a letter before.

Weighed the steel NH crank and it is even a bit heavier then a later cast NH crank.
IMG_6777.JPG
IMG_6776.JPG
weight NH 1947.JPG
User avatar
Vincent.vanGinneke
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Posts: 4311
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:14 am
Location: "The Dutch Branch"
Contact:

Re: SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

Post by Vincent.vanGinneke »

The steel crank; both cheeks are drilled and tapped for the sludge trap .
I have seen this before on a steel VH crank.
Was the factory only making one stamping and just used two of the same for building a crank ?
If so, they could have told the guy who was drilling and tapping the sludge trap holes that he only needed to do half of them... :lol:

Picture shows a look down the sludge trap hole :shock: timing side....
IMG_6780.JPG
User avatar
Eero.Korhonen
Holder of a Golden Anorak
Holder of a Golden Anorak
Posts: 1049
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:02 am
Location: Oulu, Finland
Contact:

Re: SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

Post by Eero.Korhonen »

That is quite interesting, never seen that before.
Br, Eero
Ariel VH 1954, IZH 350 1962, H-D Sportster Hugger 1992, AOMCC Member 133
User avatar
Vincent.vanGinneke
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Holder of a Platinum Anorak
Posts: 4311
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:14 am
Location: "The Dutch Branch"
Contact:

Re: SpAriel MkII aka The Hermanator

Post by Vincent.vanGinneke »

More oddities inside the 1949 steel crank, a pretty daring bodge....
NH bigend.JPG
One roller sideways ! but not enough room for a extra roller, would it have run this way ??
conrods  (1).JPG
Rod from this steel crank on top, standard WNG rod below.
I thought for a moment that they had used a VH rod with the hole excentric.
It has a pretty large lump of material on the lower part of its eye.
Part numbers are the same so is the working lenght.
Anyone seen this before ?
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests