57 Square four/ swing arm or not?
-
- Holder of a Platinum Anorak
- Posts: 5049
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 9:42 am
- Location: Victoria.. Australia.
- Contact:
Re: 57 Square four/ swing arm or not?
The easiest way to achieve this swing arm and handling thing would be to use a late 50's pre unit thunderbrd frame and adapt it to take the Sq4 engine /gearbox or better a commando type box 5 speed version to cut down the cruise revs. Those Triumph frames aren't bad at all. Nev
-
- Holder of a Waxed Cotton Anorak
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2018 8:35 am
- Contact:
Re: 57 Square four/ swing arm or not?
Thanks Paul.
I'll try to contact Peter in the new year.
I'll try to contact Peter in the new year.
- Vincent.vanGinneke
- Holder of a Platinum Anorak
- Posts: 4311
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 12:14 am
- Location: "The Dutch Branch"
- Contact:
Re: 57 Square four/ swing arm or not?
Do it.
I only once rode my dad's plunger framed '57 MkII and found it going round corners like a square (pun intended) block of wood.
How come only Norton's deserve the name 'Gardengate' !
I only once rode my dad's plunger framed '57 MkII and found it going round corners like a square (pun intended) block of wood.
How come only Norton's deserve the name 'Gardengate' !
-
- Holder of a Golden Anorak
- Posts: 2381
- Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2018 5:39 pm
- Contact:
Re: 57 Square four/ swing arm or not?
HI Nortons have got a lot better made frames, that is why so many bikers use them to build their bikes
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Roger Gwynn and 2 guests